A Response to: Six Reasons It’s Time for Brands to Replace Stock Photos With User-Generated Content

Recently I stumbled upon a post that basically blamed expert photographers for developing dull stock pictures, which dull stock pictures are the essential factor that business must be utilizing User-Generated Content.

To summarize: stock pictures are bad/boring, for that reason online marketers and business are required to look somewhere else. Deep into the post, we get this gem:

People whose work is utilized put on’’ t simply supply top quality material free of charge; after being welcomed to participate in a project, they tend to likewise frequently become its greatest cheerleader.

The author’’ s conclusion( according to me): huge rich business and mega marketing companies desire totally free photography and overdue representatives.

In this action, I’’ ll dissect a couple of essential sentences.

Let’’ s face it, stock photography is tiring.


Advertisers and their customers have actually made it that method. Their drive to pay less and less, and to use the Walmart viewpoint of worth drove professional photographers far from producing high quality/high-value images. Why develop truly great if it’’ s just worth a $1 to a Fortune Five Hundred business?

By moving the monetary concern onto the shoulders of professional photographers—“– “ Just lower your costs and license more images! It’’ s so simple to certify a million images for a 1$ each! ” stated the imaginary CFO at Getty Images that resides in my mind—– this design reduced the efficient per professional photographer profits to nearly absolutely nothing.

So what’’ s the service for ““ dull photography ”? Customers must pay more for images. That’’ s it. They would see the quality go up right away if jointly online marketers would reward and value imagination with real cash.

Best Buy commissioned me to produce a branding project—– for each scene, when I got the shot, I rapidly developed a variation with an extremely darker outlook.

As customers end up being swamped with marketing material, they progressively withstand anything that feels and look inauthentic […] 84% of millennials wear’’ t trust conventional marketing and 92% of customers trust user-generated material more than marketing.

Yes speaking with the millennial group (which is a substantial undefined continuously shapeshifting catch-all term) appears to work in a different way, however the concern that should be asked is ‘‘ what was the genuine modification? ’ I ’d state it ’ s the place.


Any market that doesn ’ t invest much time with publications (print or digital), doesn’’ t watch conventional TELEVISION, and doesn ’ t checked out a paper– you need to recognize where they get their info (and marketing) from.

A group that utilizes the web, material aggregators, socials media and text/chat chains to get their details, regularly utilizing their mobiles to do so, is going to neglect conventional techniques and channels of marketing. Even if the location altered on you doesn’’ t imply you can blame “ dull stock photography ” for your failure to link.

I was commissioned to produce images for the Oregon Lottery’’ s Powerball project—– however it’’ s constantly worth making the effort to have a little bit more enjoyable.

Satisfied consumers are significantly requiring to social networks to compose, publish or talk about items and brand name experiences they like, and those social engagements are crucial for online marketers.

I question if your market is actually connecting to brand names to reveal genuine sensations of love? I question if it’’ s most likely they are boasting to their buddy. Possibly, simply perhaps, they heard you can get well-known and/or secure free things by boasting on social networks. Your millennials are just human. This likewise appears like it has absolutely nothing to do with stock photography.

… the accessibility of unfiltered and genuine material [is growing], consisting of images, from social networks. Which provides a chance.

Translated: business wear’’ t understand how to continue a genuine discussion, so they astroturf the channels their targeted demographics survive on, affecting what they believe is working. These business are incredibly thrilled to get 1000’’ s of images without paying for them.

Here are 6 reasons that it’’ s time to ditch stock pictures in exchange for user-generated material. We can’’ t all appear like designs […] Customers understand that designs can look great in almost anything, which is why it’’ s crucial to show how that very same product searches a variety of body sizes, designs, ethnic cultures, shapes, and ages. Conventional marketing doesn’’ t quickly provide itself to that sort of range, however user-generated material does.

Putting the blame directly back on your shoulders here, online marketers. Start picking and asking for genuine looking genuine individuals, in your stock and project photography, and you’’ ll have plenty to pick from as that market section grows. Oh, and once again, you’’ ll requirement to begin paying the professional photographers to do this, due to the fact that we wear’’ t do this for “ enjoyable ”, we do it for a living, and we can ’ t aid you if you wear ’ t pay us.


People are producing much better images. The quality of user-generated material has actually increased considerably recently, with routine individuals now able to take brand-worthy images. Part of the factor for the enhancement is the slowly increasing quality of smart device video cameras, which now utilize advanced software application to assist users get the best shot each time. […] those with even a casual interest in enhancing their photography abilities have a large range of budget friendly or perhaps totally free resources to assist them up their video game […] making it possible for more beginners to record higher-quality material.

So what’’ s being stated is that an individual doesn ’ t requirement to have any experience, training, or ability to take great images—– you simply require a mobile phone and some YouTube lessons. Cool. Which is going to resolve the entire ‘‘ uninteresting ’ images thing how?’Oh right, it ’ s not.


You are likewise providing the message that huge business and big marketing companies must benefit from individuals who wear’’ t recognize they have actually produced an important product: “Oh, what an enjoyable pastime you have! Hey, sign this and we’’ ll start using/benefitting from your work while not paying you any cash. Young boy, you’’ re having a lot enjoyable!”

Olympian track and field runner Carol Rodriguez for Monster iSport.

The numbers put on’’ t lie. Brand names in different markets attain success with user-generated material every day, and in some cases the numbers are genuinely shocking. We’’ ve seen comparable outcomes throughout other channels—– from sites to microsites to show advertisements—– boost engagement, minimize bounce rates, and enhance recall.

But the numbers do lie—– and empirical conclusions wear’’ t make them genuine. The Sun appears to turn around the Earth, and I can show it by enjoying the sky!

You’’ re stating the exact same group that’’ s adverse marketing has no concerns clicking those extremely bothersome advertisements that mess up a site or are on social networks and choose to stop taking a look at meme videos to go take a look at the site for an item they currently own? They’’ re not clicking by mishap to make it disappear, due to UI style techniques? And you’’ re sure it ’ s not the outcome of a click-farm someplace?


Data doesn’’ t lie– however it ’ s incredibly simple to slip a little verification predisposition into the mix and choose that your information supports your concepts.’There ’ s an opportunity the author is right, however once again this is not the fault of expert photographers.


Though stock photography libraries can appear limitless, those who have actually hung around digging through them for the ideal shot understand that it can be painfully hard to discover precisely what they’’ re searching for– specifically if they ’ re searching for something that looks genuine.

. You’’ ve simply explained project photography—– where business pay professional photographers to develop something not-boring, genuine, particularly and specifically for them, utilizing skill that represents their genuine group. And surprise surprise, this images can be utilized even on social networks! Odd?

By contrast, user-generated material uses an even higher and continuously broadening swimming pool of material to select from. It’’ s a lot much easier to discover genuine individuals showing genuine feelings– like pleasure, worry, surprise—– on social media than it is to discover designs and stars with the chops to nail those expressions in a stock photography swimming pool.

. Once again. Specifically in the world of stock photography since online marketers stopped paying professional photographers genuine costs for their work. It’’ s not hard to produce actually great stock images that have all surprise, pleasure and worry you desire. It is difficult to do though if you’’ ve chose that an image deserves $1, or in the events you’’ ve been explaining, $0.

Good, Fast, Cheap. They can just get 2.

With user-generated material, nevertheless, [business are] able to gather images and videos from everywhere, with a volume and point of view unequaled by anything stock photography libraries can provide.

Yes, obviously they can. And pay really little bit for them. Due to the fact that you can do something does not imply you have authorization to do it, simply.

.When you include their content [#ppppp> People will assist spread out the word about your brand name …] Individuals whose work is utilized put on’’ t simply offer top quality material totally free.

Right there. You stated it. I estimate ““ premium — ” and “ totally free ”– am I the just one that has an issue with this design? I’’ m quite sure all those Fortune 500 business might manage to spend for top quality material. Doubling down, and making these individuals likewise offer you with totally free representative responsibilities? Damn.

It’’ s never ever been much easier. Numerous online marketers understand that audiences react much better to user-generated material, yet lots of are frightened by the job of sourcing images—– for instance, protecting rights to utilize them […] User-generated material has actually never ever been more available, reliable or of greater quality than it is today. Why would anybody continue utilizing stock images?

I’’ ll concur with the author here a minimum of, it has actually never ever been much easier to rip-off your method into getting countless images, utilizing them for business gains, and not paying a penny. Online marketers must repent.

Don’’ t blame expert photographers for not supplying you with totally free, high quality, not-boring images—– you can put that blame best at your own feet.

Again, you can check out the initial short article here .

About the author: Andy Batt is a professional photographer of home entertainment, movement, sports, and individuals. The viewpoints revealed in this short article are exclusively those of the author. You can discover more of Batt’s deal with his site , Facebook , Twitter , and Instagram . This short article was likewise released here .


Read more: petapixel.com

You may also like...

Popular Posts